Evaluating historical views of leadership Evaluating historical views of leadership Over the years, leadership has evolved through three major phases, namely trait, behavioural, and situational.
Meredith Simmons Running head: This evaluation of historical views of leadership involved a review of the theories of W. Du Bois, Lao-tzu, and Niccolo Machiavelli which yielded evidence of conflicting viewpoints on the topic of leadership throughout the ages.
They presented various traits of effective leadership ability and set examples for leaders to draw influence from as they formulate their own theories in more modern times.
Commonalities and Disparities W. Du Bois believed that a certain segment of intelligent and educated black men were meant to lead their race. Lao-tzu thought that the most effective leaders were those who had the ability to lead when their followers barely knew they existed in a leadership capacity.
Finally, Machiavelli believed that leaders or rulers should operate by force Wren, After completing the assigned readings about these men, it was noted that each of them were well- educated and impressive achievers of their respective times. Lao-tzu was a Chinese sage, who was deemed a man of profound wisdom by his followers.
Machiavelli was a renowned diplomat and a theorist of the 16th century.
Another commonality was that these men were each authors on the subject of leadership theory. They did not simply act based on their own theory, but also produced writings to be used as framework for others.
They works reflect this commonality. Du Bois wrote the Souls of Black Folk. His writings expounded on his belief that the Talented Tenth of the black race should be educated and molded into leaders in efforts to improve conditions for their race.
In his writings, he emphasized the importance of formal education for black youth via colleges and universities. He wrote about how leaders are most effective when they attempt to mediate when solving differences as opposed to taking sides.
His book Tao Te Ching, a compilation of his lifelong meditation, reflected his theories and is revered as a classic or world literature. He wrote about the importance of leaders exhibiting honesty, calmness, and stressed the idea that leaders should always put the needs of others ahead of his own.
His writings indicated that he believed in ruling by any means necessary. His work, the Prince, is a classic based on the pragmatic use of force and power in society. He also detailed the importance of leaders embodying good qualities, such as: However, he stressed that they must be able to balance these qualities to suit given situations.
More specifically, Machiavelli stressed that it was appropriate for a leader to act in opposition to the afore-mentioned qualities to preserve his kingdom or following when necessary.
Machiavelli also penned the Discourses, which defined the benefits of a republic according to his standard Wren, One of the most noticeable disparities identified was the idea that Lao-tzu believed in trusting followers to make good choices and live in harmony of their own free will, while Machiavelli did not trust his followers to make their own decisions in the best interest of their society.
Du Bois and Lao-tzu demonstrated that they had faith in the abilities of their followers to make progress by their own actions. Du Bois believed that leaders have inborn capacity, and that they could rise to be very influential given the appropriate education and opportunity.
Lao-tzu led his followers to meditate and perform acts in concert for the betterment of all. Conversely, Machiavelli believed that leadership was based on influence via social power.Running head: EVALUATING HISTORICAL VIEWS OF LEADERSHIP 1 Evaluating Historical Views to Leadership EVALUATING HISTORICAL VIEWS OF LEADERSHIP 2 Evaluating Historical Views of Leadership The process of this evaluation involved an analysis of the commonalities and disparities among a group of leaders, which were .
Each view contains commonalities and disparities which offer conflicting perspectives on the complex topic of leadership throughout the ages of modern society. The goal is to broaden these views with critical evaluation, vetted scholarly sources and well-reasoned judgments.
Evaluating historical views of leadership share 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Over the years, leadership has evolved through three major phases, namely trait, behavioural, and situational. Whatever personal views arise after reviewing these masterworks there are some truths furthering the argument that leadership theory is an ever evolving door and a melting pot of ideas derived from many figures throughout history. Evaluating Historical Views of Leadership The process of this evaluation involved an analysis of the commonalities and disparities among a group of leaders, which were largely influenced by the times in which they lived.
Evaluating Historical Views of Leadership This paper evaluates the leadership views of Plato, Aristotle, Lao-Tzu, and Machiavelli from the point of view of the modern military leader.
The process of evaluation includes an examination of the commonalities and disparities between these views of leadership. Write a 1, to 1,word paper critically analyzing and evaluating a leadership scenario based on your analytical framework developed from our Week readings and any additional research obtained from the University Library resources.
LDR A Leadership Theories and Practice School: University of Phoenix Analyzing and Evaluating Historical Views of Leadership Paper Final Draft Analyzing and Evaluating Historical Views of Leadership Paper Final Draft.
10 pages. Evaluating Contemporary Views of Leadership and Application. Evaluating Historical Views of Leadership The process of this evaluation involved an analysis of the commonalities and disparities among a group of leaders, which were largely influenced by the times in which they lived.